<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electriccarstocks.com/2010/01/17/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2010-01-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electriccarstocks.com/2010/01/17/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2010-01-17/</link>
	<description>Best coverage on Electric Cars &#38; Stocks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:25:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: san</title>
		<link>http://electriccarstocks.com/2010/01/17/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2010-01-17/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electriccarstocks.com/2010/01/17/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2010-01-17/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>We need to think hybrid and or dependability.  Which ever gets the job done.  If I thought that I could have an electric car that I could depend on starting at -30 F then could go for 60 miles, 20 of which would be at 60mph , I would buy it.  Of course if it is a hybrid it would need to get much better mileage per gallon that my current car.  Thus far we have no product that reasonably supports the average american&#039;s need.  For shame... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to think hybrid and or dependability.  Which ever gets the job done.  If I thought that I could have an electric car that I could depend on starting at -30 F then could go for 60 miles, 20 of which would be at 60mph , I would buy it.  Of course if it is a hybrid it would need to get much better mileage per gallon that my current car.  Thus far we have no product that reasonably supports the average american&#039;s need.  For shame&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Car Stocks &#124; Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-17 &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</title>
		<link>http://electriccarstocks.com/2010/01/17/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2010-01-17/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Car Stocks &#124; Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-17 &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electriccarstocks.com/2010/01/17/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2010-01-17/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>[...] more: Electric Car Stocks &#124; Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-17   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more: Electric Car Stocks | Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-17   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Car Stocks &#124; Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-17 &#124; Alternative Fuel Automotive Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://electriccarstocks.com/2010/01/17/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2010-01-17/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Car Stocks &#124; Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-17 &#124; Alternative Fuel Automotive Wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electriccarstocks.com/2010/01/17/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2010-01-17/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>[...] Read this article: Electric Car Stocks &#124; Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-17 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read this article: Electric Car Stocks | Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-17 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

